Frack is wack

Sierra Halstenberg

Price Gregory International (PGI)

Fracking is real. It’s dangerous. And, it’s currently causing fouled water wells, air pollution and leaks of climate-warming methane into the atmosphere. America needs energy. That’s understanding. But, where do the boundaries lie?

The Atlantic Coast Pipeline is sneaking its way through the George Washington National Forest transporting fracked natural gas from West Virginia.  The pipeline project would affect approximately 295.6 miles of a 42-inch-diameter pipeline in Harrison, Lewis, Upshur, Randolph, and Pocahontas Counties in West Virginia. West Virginia and Virginia residents are concerned what environmental impacts the pipeline will have.

What the frack is fracking? BCMJ_55Vol5_bccdc_figure Hydraulic fracturing, known as “fracking,” is the extraction process that pumps water, sand and chemicals into the ground at extremely high pressures to puncture the buried rock that harbors the gas. In many areas in America, West Virginia included, fracking represents as a threat to water, land, air and outdoor recreational activities.

Facts about Atlantic Coast Pipeline acp-exhibit-a-project-overview-map

1) The pipeline involves construction of a 550-mile long natural gas pipeline to carry natural gas from West Virginia through Virginia to North Carolina, costing $2,000,000,000.

2) Forty to fifty miles of the pipeline will run through national forests.

3) Thirteen miles of the pipeline is expected to go through the George Washington National Forest, which protects an important stretch of the Appalachian Trail as well as the James and Potomac Rivers, and provides drinking water for more than five million people.

4) In order to build and maintain the pipeline, a 200-foot cleared construction right-of-way, a 75-foot cleared permanent right-of-way and access roads would be constructed in the GWNF.

Community Concerns

Lisa Bragg voices her concerns and introduces an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline.

• The pipeline impacts need to be evaluated and studied for all phases of the project, from construction through completion. FERC should evaluate, explain and have thourough contengencey plans for environmental impacts before construction, including and most importantly safety for citizens and the environment. These should include but are not limited to the following: the potential use of fly ash for backfill, and cumulative impacts following the completion of the pipeline, such as any and all types fracking and impact of fracking to land and water.

• FERC should stop out of state private corporations from threatening land owners with eminent domain when these corporations have no plans to benefit the citizens of WV. These citizens also are currently being served by existing pipelines and are not intrested in doing forced business with these types of rogue corporations. Putting profits before people is unconstitutional and should be avoided at all costs.

• The Monongahela National Forest is sensitive ecosystem, and FERC should avoid impacting this area. Constructing a pipeline will increase forest fragmentation, so FERC avoid destruction of our protected forest and intstead study the impact such a pipeline would have on local wildlife.

• Geology and soils: West Virginia contains many unique geologic features including an extensive underground cave system that is an important part of WV tourism. FERC should also study the impacts of increased sedimentation from fracking runoff and loss of topsoil during any type of construction but never allow a pipeline to occur.

• Land use: WV is known for its outdoor recreational opportunities. FERC should realize how the pipeline would greatly impact and decimate outdoor recreation and tourism but not allow a pipeline to ever alter this precious

c3bd6d93b76c0e00480f6a7067001a24Water resources, fisheries and wetland: The pipeline will have to cross numerous streams, rivers, and wetlands. FERC should study how many crossings will occur, the acres of wetlands to be disturbed and how the pipeline will impact springs and drinking water sources. Impacts to freshwater streams will also affect fisheries resources, which is an important part of the state’s ecology and tourism. With impacts to the hydrology there could be cumulative effects such as flooding, so FERC should study how the construction impacts from disturbing streams and wetlands will impact flood events. FERC should get outside studies done on how Fracking would impact our water resources, fisheries and wetlands. By getting several outside studies done this will prove how dangerous fracking is to our citizens and environment.

• West Virginia contains many cultural resources, such as Native American and civil war artifacts; How the will the pipeline’s construction will impact these cultural resources?

• Vegetation and wildlife: Appalachian mountains contain very diverse vegetation that provide a lot of economic benefits such as ginseng and several tree species such as red spruce that are already in decline. FERC should study how the pipeline will impact these and other important vegetation species. West Virginia has diverse wildlife populations from large mammals to small salamanders that play an important role in the ecosystem. FERC should study how the construction will impact West Virginia’s wildlife species including breeding and nesting grounds, migration routes, and increased predation from the proposed pipeline corridor. How will fracking impact all of this?

• Air Quality and Noise: Compression stations and construction will diminish air quality and have increased noise levels. The proximity of the compressor station and pipeline to communities and nearby residences and how to mitigate adverse effects should be fully studied.

• Endangered and Threatened Species: West Virginia contains many threatened and endangered species; evaluate how the pipeline will impact all the threatened and endangered species through disturbance, habitat loss, breeding, etc and how the negative impact will be mitigated or avoided.

• Public Safety: Because of the flammability of natural gas, the pipeline is at risk of an explosion. FERC should consider the blast radius should an explosion occur and how many residences are within the blast radius. Further, they should study mitigation efforts to avoid densely populated areas. Study the health risks associated with living near a compressor station or a leaking natural gas pipeline. Study fracking earthquakes will they have an impact on WV’s infrastructure, interstates, dam’s and citizen’s homes, bridges and historic buildings? __________________________________________________________________________________________________

Fracking has been going on for decades, increasing jobs and new wealth in states. But, aren’t the downsides serious enough to be deal-breakers?



2 thoughts on “Frack is wack

  1. Being from Virginia, attending college in West Virginia, and having family that owns property in North Carolina; I can definitely relate to your concern with fracking and the pipeline. I love everything about the outdoors: the scenery, the recreation, the wildlife, the weather…everything. The outdoors is honestly one of the top reasons I chose to come to West Virginia, because I love outdoor recreations such as hiking, skiing, climbing, hunting, and fishing. Fracking and the pipeline would ultimately ruin a lot of these. Since this pipeline would be effecting three states that are significant to my life, it is very concerning to me. I am from Richmond, Virginia, literally living right on the James River and this topic is just as controversial there as it is in this state. Considering my love for the outdoors, I liked how you mentioned how this pipeline would brutally hurt West Virginia’s recreational tourism, which brings them in a lot of their money. Now that I think about it, when I’m home in Virginia, I constantly hear West Virginia commercials on the radio advertising their wildlife recreation, that is probably the top reason people vacation there in the fist place. These out-of-state companies are benefiting financially off of destroying the financial benefits for states like the three you mentioned. This isn’t right, but what is the right solution? I guess that’s where it gets political, and I obviously don’t have an alternative, so I’ll be interested to see where this goes.


  2. Wow, you gave a ton of good information in this post. I had been hearing a lot about this pipeline that is going to go in, but I had no idea that it was going to be going through national forests. I also didn’t realize the massive effect it could have on our drinking water and such. I live in Lewis County and I know that at one point they were talking like the pipeline was going to go in right near my house, and I was so afraid of just the mess it was going to bring as far as tearing up the road and all the mud everywhere. But it sounds like I should have been worried about way more than just the mess. I should have been worried about everything. I really like all the visuals you used throughout your post!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s